OpenPrescribing Improvement Radar¶
What this tool does¶
This tool identifies sub-ICB locations (SICBLs) which have shown substantial improvement across each of our OpenPrescribing measures. The five SICBLs with the largest improvement are reported. We hope this will stimulate discussion with areas that have made effective changes so that successful strategies can be shared.
How it works¶
The tool currently uses the following criteria to identify improvement:
- SICBLs needed to be, on average, in the highest 20% during the first 6 months of the time period shown.
- SICBLs needed to improve to be, on average, in the lowest 50% of SICBLs during the last 6 months of the period shown.
- The rate of the measure has to decrease by at least 5% across the time period shown (calculated as the difference between the average rate for the first 6 months and the last 6 months).
- There needed to be, on average, at least 50 prescription items written.
We are continuing to review how we might further optimise these criteria to detect even more interesting changes in future. For example, we may be able to introduce elements of a ‘trend indicator saturation’ methodology (which we have used in previous research). You can find more information on this here, including a podcast on our work with Professor Ben Goldacre.
Interpretation notes¶
These pilot results are provided for the interest of advanced users, although we don't know how relevant they are in practice. There is substantial variation in prescribing behaviours, across various different areas of medicine. Some variation can be explained by demographic changes, or local policies or guidelines, but much of the remaining variation is less easy to explain.
We are keen to hear your feedback on this tool and how you use it. You can do this by emailing us at [email protected]. Please do not include patient identifiable information in your feedback.
This tool currently uses prescribing data between June 2019 and June 2024. We plan to update the tool every 3 months.
Table of Contents
- Prescribing of Amino Acid Formula (AAF) and Extensively Hydrolysed Formula (EHF))
- Antibiotic stewardship: volume of antibiotic prescribing
- Antibiotic stewardship: courses for amoxicillin 500mg greater than 15 capsules
- Anxiolytics and Hypnotics: Average Daily Quantity per item
- Anxiolytics and Hypnotics: Average Daily Quantity per 1000 patients
- Antibiotic stewardship: co-amoxiclav, cephalosporins & quinolones
- Antibiotic stewardship: co-amoxiclav, cephalosporins & quinolones prescribing volume
- Environmental impact of inhalers - average carbon footprint per salbutamol inhaler
- Prescribing of continuous glucose monitoring sensors
- Ciclosporin and tacrolimus oral preparations prescribed generically
- Cost of milk formulae for Cow's Milk Protein Allergy (CMPA) per listed patients aged 0-4
- Diltiazem preparations (>60mg) prescribed generically
- Antibiotic stewardship: courses for doxycycline 100mg greater than 6 capsules/dispersible tablets
- Proportion of Direct Acting Oral Anticoagulants (DOACs) not prescribed as edoxaban or generic apixaban
- Environmental impact of inhalers - Prescribing of the less environmentally friendly Metered Dose Inhaler (MDI) (excluding salbutamol)
- Possible excess quantities of semaglutide and tirzepatide
- Antibiotic stewardship: fluoroquinolone items per 1000 patients
- Topical treatment of fungal nail infections
- Prescribing of gabapentin and pregabalin (DDD)
- Prescribing of gluten free products
- High-cost drugs for erectile dysfunction
- High dose inhaled corticosteroids
- Antibiotic stewardship: Injectable preparations for the treatment of infection
- Non-preferred NSAIDs and COX-2 inhibitors
- Items which should not routinely be prescribed in primary care - aliskiren
- Items which should not routinely be prescribed in primary care - amiodarone
- Items which should not routinely be prescribed in primary care - bath and shower emollients
- Items which should not routinely be prescribed in primary care - co-proxamol
- Items which should not routinely be prescribed in primary care - dosulepin
- Items which should not routinely be prescribed in primary care - doxazosin modified release
- Items which should not routinely be prescribed in primary care - dronedarone
- Items which should not routinely be prescribed in primary care - immediate release fentanyl
- Items which should not routinely be prescribed in primary care - glucosamine and chondroitin
- Items which should not routinely be prescribed in primary care - herbal medicines
- Items which should not routinely be prescribed in primary care - homeopathy
- Items which should not routinely be prescribed in primary care - lidocaine plasters
- Items which should not routinely be prescribed in primary care - liothyronine (including Armour Thyroid and liothyronine combination products)
- Items which should not routinely be prescribed in primary care - lutein and antioxidants
- Items which should not routinely be prescribed in primary care - minocycline
- Items which should not routinely be prescribed in primary care - insulin pen needles costing ≥£5 per 100 needles
- Items which should not routinely be prescribed in primary care - omega-3 fatty acid compounds (excluding icosapent ethyl [Vazkepa®])
- Items which should not routinely be prescribed in primary care - oxycodone and naloxone combination product
- Items which should not routinely be prescribed in primary care - perindopril arginine
- Items which should not routinely be prescribed in primary care - rubefacients, benzydamine, mucopolysaccharide and cooling products
- Items which should not routinely be prescribed in primary care - silk garments
- Items which should not routinely be prescribed in primary care - paracetamol and tramadol combination
- Items which should not routinely be prescribed in primary care - travel vaccines
- Items which should not routinely be prescribed in primary care - trimipramine
- Items which should not routinely be prescribed in primary care - all items
- Methotrexate 10 mg tablets
- Blood glucose testing strips not included in NHS England commissioning recommendations
- Blood glucose testing lancets not included in NHS England commissioning recommendations
- Prescribing of opioids (total oral morphine equivalence)
- High dose opioids per 1000 patients
- High dose opioid items as percentage regular opioids
- Bile acid sequestrants, fibrates, nicotinic acid, and omega 3 fatty acids
- Higher dose Proton Pump Inhibitors (PPIs)
- Prescribing of pregabalin (total mg)
- Probiotics that have been removed from the drug tariff
- Short acting beta agonist inhalers
- Seven Day Prescribing for Long Term Conditions
- Silver dressings
- Soluble/effervescent forms of paracetamol and co-codamol
- Low and medium intensity statins
- Toothpaste Prescribing
- Antibiotic stewardship: three-day courses for uncomplicated UTIs
- Vitamin B complex per 1000 patients
Number of organisations with improvement identified: 4
Number of organisations with improvement identified: 1
Number of organisations with improvement identified: 5
Number of organisations with improvement identified: 1
No organisations met the technical criteria for detecting substantial change on this measure.
Number of organisations with improvement identified: 1
No organisations met the technical criteria for detecting substantial change on this measure.
Number of organisations with improvement identified: 5
No organisations met the technical criteria for detecting substantial change on this measure.
No organisations met the technical criteria for detecting substantial change on this measure.
No organisations met the technical criteria for detecting substantial change on this measure.
Number of organisations with improvement identified: 1
Number of organisations with improvement identified: 5
Number of organisations with improvement identified: 1
Number of organisations with improvement identified: 3
Number of organisations with improvement identified: 2
Number of organisations with improvement identified: 2
Number of organisations with improvement identified: 1
No organisations met the technical criteria for detecting substantial change on this measure.
Number of organisations with improvement identified: 4
Number of organisations with improvement identified: 3
Number of organisations with improvement identified: 2
No organisations met the technical criteria for detecting substantial change on this measure.
No organisations met the technical criteria for detecting substantial change on this measure.
Number of organisations with improvement identified: 3
Number of organisations with improvement identified: 1
Number of organisations with improvement identified: 1
Number of organisations with improvement identified: 2
Number of organisations with improvement identified: 1
Number of organisations with improvement identified: 5
No organisations met the technical criteria for detecting substantial change on this measure.
Number of organisations with improvement identified: 3
No organisations met the technical criteria for detecting substantial change on this measure.
Number of organisations with improvement identified: 3
Number of organisations with improvement identified: 1
No organisations met the technical criteria for detecting substantial change on this measure.
No organisations met the technical criteria for detecting substantial change on this measure.
Number of organisations with improvement identified: 2
Number of organisations with improvement identified: 4
Number of organisations with improvement identified: 2
Number of organisations with improvement identified: 3
Number of organisations with improvement identified: 2
Number of organisations with improvement identified: 3
No organisations met the technical criteria for detecting substantial change on this measure.
Number of organisations with improvement identified: 1
No organisations met the technical criteria for detecting substantial change on this measure.
Number of organisations with improvement identified: 2
Number of organisations with improvement identified: 3
Number of organisations with improvement identified: 3
No organisations met the technical criteria for detecting substantial change on this measure.
Number of organisations with improvement identified: 4
Number of organisations with improvement identified: 2
No organisations met the technical criteria for detecting substantial change on this measure.
Number of organisations with improvement identified: 2
Number of organisations with improvement identified: 1
No organisations met the technical criteria for detecting substantial change on this measure.
Number of organisations with improvement identified: 1
No organisations met the technical criteria for detecting substantial change on this measure.
No organisations met the technical criteria for detecting substantial change on this measure.
Number of organisations with improvement identified: 2
No organisations met the technical criteria for detecting substantial change on this measure.
No organisations met the technical criteria for detecting substantial change on this measure.
Number of organisations with improvement identified: 1
Number of organisations with improvement identified: 2
No organisations met the technical criteria for detecting substantial change on this measure.
Number of organisations with improvement identified: 1
Number of organisations with improvement identified: 2